In the encroachment scenario, which remedy is typically available to stop the encroachment even if no damages occurred?

Study for the Torts Multistate Bar Examination. Enhance your knowledge with multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Develop the skills needed to excel in your bar exam!

Multiple Choice

In the encroachment scenario, which remedy is typically available to stop the encroachment even if no damages occurred?

Explanation:
When land is encroached upon, the remedy most appropriate to stop the intrusion is an injunction. An injunction is a court order requiring the intruder to halt the encroachment and, if needed, to remove the encroaching intrusion. This relief is available even without showing damages because the harm is ongoing and cannot be adequately prevented by money alone. Damages might compensate for past harm in a trespass claim, but they don’t stop ongoing encroachment. Ownership transfer doesn’t address preventing the intrusion, and dismissal ends the case without resolving the encroachment issue. So the remedy typically available to stop the encroachment, even without damages, is an injunction.

When land is encroached upon, the remedy most appropriate to stop the intrusion is an injunction. An injunction is a court order requiring the intruder to halt the encroachment and, if needed, to remove the encroaching intrusion. This relief is available even without showing damages because the harm is ongoing and cannot be adequately prevented by money alone. Damages might compensate for past harm in a trespass claim, but they don’t stop ongoing encroachment. Ownership transfer doesn’t address preventing the intrusion, and dismissal ends the case without resolving the encroachment issue. So the remedy typically available to stop the encroachment, even without damages, is an injunction.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy